Thursday, September 28, 2023

 

OBITUARY

MS Swaminathan Legendary Agri-Scientist Who Catalysed The Current Grain Surplus For 1.44 Billion People, Dies At 98

The legendary scientist, born in 1925, that transformed an India that was dependent on wheat shipments as food aid from America, into a food surplus nation, has just passed away in his home in Chennai at the age of 98.  

Lauded on his demise by the President, Prime Minister, Home Minister and Agriculture Minister amongst many eminent and ordinary Bharatiyas, Dr. Mankombu  Sambasivan Swaminathan is succeeded by three highly educated and accomplished daughters.

Assisted by the influential American agronomist and Nobel Peace Prize laureate Dr. Norman Ernest Borlaug, the exceptional vision of Dr. MS Swaminathan transformed India’s staple food yields.

From near famine conditions in 1960s Bharat, Dr Swaminathan catalysed the Nehru Government effort towards the ample production of the ‘Green Revolution’ that matured fully during the regime of Indira Gandhi as prime minister.

It all began with a 100 kg bag of seeds of the Mexican Dwarf Wheat sent to Dr Swaminathan by Dr Borlaug. From this small beginning, the wheat yields in India grew more than ten-fold. This was occasioned, after Dr Swaminathan’s conviction in the matter, and his extensive studies in India and several countries abroad.

MS Swaminathan turned down opportunities to work in America, in order to return to his home country to make what turned out to be his singular contribution.

Swaminathan’s early and yeoman efforts towards the introduction of high yielding and disease resistant varieties of wheat, rice, potatoes, and other crops ended the period of chronic food shortfalls in Bharat once and for all. It is said Ms Swaminathan chose his profession as a agricultural scientist after noting the ravages of the Bengal famine in the 1940s. 

MS Swaminathan recognised the potential of the Mexican dwarf wheat varieties early in the day, causing Nehru to write to the Rockefeller Foundation that was financing Dr. Borlaug’s research in Mexico. Swaminathan invited Borlaug to tour India and see conditions for himself, which Borlaug did in 1964. Thereafter, the 1970 Nobel laureate sent Swaminathan a bag containing 100 kg of the Mexican dwarf seed created by Borlaug at the International Centre for Wheat and Maize improvement in Mexico. Dr Swaminathan’s intent was to breed these with varieties from Japan.

By 1956, Mexico had already become self-sufficient in wheat using Borlaug’s dwarf varieties, and Swaminathan was convinced Bharat could do likewise.

On receipt of the new varieties of wheat, Swaminathan started them on a number of experimental plots in different places in Bharat and noted their high yields and disease resistance. Along with his team of scientists, he then organised large numbers of farmers to plant the new varieties in several parts of the country but most notably in Punjab. In 1965, the Indian Agriculture Minister C Subramaniam aided the process by ordering 250 tonnes of the seed.

Swaminathan also introduced new varieties of potato including a frost resistant variety he had developed while working in Wisconsin, USA.

In addition, Swaminathan developed rice varieties with better carbon fixation which allowed for improved photosynthesis and water usage.

Dr MS Swaminathan completed his batchelor’s degree in agricultural science followed by a postgraduate degree in cytogenetics. He served as the Director General of The Indian Council of Agricultural Research (ICAR) and the International Rice Research Institute in the Philippines. He also served as the Principal Secretary in the Ministry of Agriculture in 1979. In 1988 Swaminathan was appointed President of the International Union for the Conservation of Nature.

Dr MS Swaminathan won a profusion of national and international awards including the Ramon Magsaysay Award in 1971, The World Food Prize in 1987 and the Padma Vibushan in 1989. Swaminathan was awarded scores of honorary doctorates throughout his active life.

He was a pivotal figure for decades in India’s march to not just self-sufficiency in food, but creation of enormous surpluses for strategic reserves and exports. This even as the population has more than quadrupled since independence along with a doubling of life expectancy.

(653 words)

September 29th, 2023

For: Firstpost/News18.com

Gautam Mukherjee

Monday, September 11, 2023

 

KSA Is Now In The Driving Seat For the Bharat West Asia Europe Corridor Incorporating Road, Rail, Port ,Digital Connectivity & Backed By The US

 His Royal Highness Mohamed Bin Salman (MBS), Crown Prince and de facto ruler of the Kingdom of Saudi Arabia (KSA), (on behalf of his ailing and elderly father King Salman of the Royal House of Saud), has launched his State Visit to India on the 11th of September 2023. This is his second state visit since February 2019.

This state visit has come immediately after MBS attended the very successful two-day G21 Summit, concluded on the 10th. A number of new agreements are likely to be signed during the one-day bilateral meeting with Prime Minister Modi at Hyderabad House in the capital. Bharat and KSA have also become strategic partners and will be signing the minutes of the first meeting of a strategic council formed for the purpose. Bharat is presently Saudi Arabia’s second largest trading partner but the potential to grow it in quantum and volume terms is considerable. MBS clearly sees this, and is putting his policy heft behind this endeavour alongside Prime Minister Narendra Modi.

Agreements on defence, security, trade, services, labour, manufacturing, supply chains, energy, including alternate and renewable energy, agriculture, food security, digital technology, Artificial Intelligence (AI), two-way investment programmes, cooperation in space, are some of the areas that will be covered.

Of course, the big new development at the G21 Summit is the massive infrastructure project announced. It was one of the biggest, important and immediately tangible announcements at the Summit. An integrated road, rail, port, ship, sea and digitally connected corridor leading from Bharat through West Asia overland as well as land/sea to Europe, will be commenced within 60 days by all the countries concerned. It will also link the regions it passes through with electricity connectivity and incorporate green Hydrogen pipelines.

It is inclusive of, and will involve, most of the countries in the West Asian region including the UAE, Oman, Jordan, Israel, and then on to Europe by land, as well as via Port Haifa in Israel and Port Piraeus in Greece. It is a massive project involving trillions of dollars in investment, expected to come from in-country resources, multilateral sources such as the World Bank and IMF, some private investment, all underwritten by the US, which is also a member of the I2U2 strategic initiative. It is likely to earn huge resources as well when completed. It has the potential of speeding goods movements from Bharat to Europe by as much as 40%, saving both time and money.

This new set of integrated routes will be an alternative to the overburdened and out-of-date Suez Canal.

The KSA was drifting away from the US after the controversies and criticisms  raised against MBS by America after the grisly murder of dissident Saudi journalist Khashoggi in Turkiye. So much so, that Saudi Arabia drew closer to China that even brokered a rapprochement between Iran and Saudi Arabia. The KSA also did Yuan trades with China for its petroleum exports to the dragon.

President Biden therefore looked visibly pleased at the G21 Summit with Bharat’s initiative of this new Corridor that drew KSA, an old ally, back into the US sphere of influence.

The new and momentous announcement threatens the Chinese debt-trap creating Belt and Road Initiative (BRI), and its recent growing influence in West Asia that even sought to mediate in the KSA War with the Houthi rebels in Yemen.

Soon after the announcement of this new corridor, G7 member Italy announced its withdrawal from China’s BRI via its Prime Minister Giorgia Meloni, very much present at the G21 Summit.

From the Bharatiya perspective, the straws have been in the wind for some time. Adani is already redeveloping Haifa Port in Israel. Haifa is famous from WWI as the place liberated by Bharatiya troops working in the British Empire Army. Those brave mounted soldiers are immortalised in a sculpture facing Teen Murti Bhavan in New Delhi, which was once the residence of the British Indian Army Chief.

Recently Prime Minister Narendra Modi made a visit to  Athens, Greece, on his way home from Johannesburg where he had gone to attend the BRICS Summit. Greece was last visited by Bharatiya Prime Minister Indira Gandhi, way back, in 1983.

Piraeus Port development in Greece is also on Adani’s radar. Greece is keen on becoming Bharat’s gateway to Europe as expressed by Greek Prime Minister Kyriakos Mitsotakis and President Karerina Sakellaropoulou during Modi’s day-long recent visit.

The Adani Group has been foremost in modern port development and green infrastructure projects in Bharat, and even coal-mining in Australia. It has been active throughout the last ten years, and even earlier, starting with the highly modern Kandla container handling port and terminus in Gujarat.

Indian Railways has reformed and revived its abilities and could well play a stellar part in the new West-Asian portion of the corridor.

India’s Reliance Industries, one of the world’s biggest petroleum refiners, is an early mover in the area of Hydrogen production and its application in transport amongst other things.

Officially called the India-Middle East-Europe Economic Corridor (IMEC), it is being hailed as a modern-day Spice Route. It is expected to stimulate economic development throughout the Eurasian corridor. In the European section, participants include France, Germany, Italy, the US and the EU.

The MoU drafted at the New Delhi G21 has been signed by India, USA, UAE, Saudi Arabia, France, Germany, Italy and the European Union.

 In an initiative that will enthuse the 55 nation African Union, newly a part of the G21, the United States will simultaneously invest in a rail line from Angola in Central Africa, to the Indian Ocean.

China, that absented itself from the New Delhi Summit, is not only stymied diplomatically by these initiatives, it really does not have the money anymore to see its BRI dreams through as the sole financier. The 146 signatories to the BRI will, no doubt, begin to abandon it, following Italy’s example.

Saudi Arabia will play a pivotal role in the West Asian section of the corridor along with the UAE, Israel and Bharat. But through this back-to-back state visit, MBS who’s stopped in New Delhi since the 8th of September, seeks to expand the strategic partnership with Bharat into multiple avenues. The endeavour is to take it far beyond being one of the world’s biggest petroleum producers. Bharat, on its way to becoming the 3rd biggest economy in the world with a projected GDP of over $10 trillion, is equally keen on the win-win development.

 

(1,074 words)

September 11, 2023

For: Firstpost/News18.com

Gautam Mukherjee

Saturday, September 9, 2023

 

The G21 New Delhi Summit With 43 Countries -Invitees, Multilateral Institutions, The Global South & The African Union

This G21 can only be seen as Bharat’s unprecedented and spectacular coming- out-party at the high table bedecked with gleaming silverware. It is hosted by our charismatic Prime Minister Narendra Modi who has established himself as a significant and influential global leader.  

The attendance underlines the recognition of this country as the unstoppable 3rd largest global power by 2030, with likely a $ 10 trillion plus economy by then.

The first dramatic accomplishment, at the very start of the deliberations today at this mighty gathering, was the induction of the 55 country African Union as a permanent member of the G20 to make it up to G21.

This represents the result of not only Bharat’s steadfast sponsorship and advocacy of this cause, but the recognition of a changing world order. It has been dominated for long and is still led by the G7 countries. Now they, at the urging of India, the obsolescence and racism of old methods, are willing to change.  The economic and political world order has remained almost unchanged since WWII with the West in the driver’s seat. However, the emergence of ancient and modern countries like Bharat that believes in its inclusive and peaceful principles has made an impact. Amongst Prime Minister Modi’s many ‘one world’ coinages, he uses the term ‘Humancentric’ which seems to resonate with other leaders.  

In a counter to Chinese neo-imperialism, institutions like the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF) are going to receive a $ 200 billion injection announced by the United States. Terms will be renegotiated to offer better lending formats to the African Union and other countries of the Global South, groaning under massive and unsupportable debt.

African countries have had to pay as much as five times as much for its multilateral loans which have ended up badly roiling their economies. China has in recent years exploited this anomaly with rapacious terms for  their development loans. These were extended, sometimes to access rich mineral resources, and at other times to push China’s Belt and Road Programme (BRI). Almost all of it however has been bogged down as bad debt because there is little bankability of these developments. It has, in turn, been putting immense pressure on the Chinese economy as well.

The most powerful and significant countries of the world are all here in New Delhi for the two-day summit, with two notable exceptions.

President Putin preoccupied with the Ukraine War, sent his venerable Foreign Minister Lavrov. President Xi Jinping, probably occupied with immense domestic economic ‘turmoil’, as characterised by senior members of the ruling CCP, sent Premier Li who is well known for his economic management. However this came unstuck with his disastrous handling of the severe lockdowns in major Chinese cities during Covid.

Both Russia and China heads, seen as ever closer allies, stayed away from the recent ASEAN Summit in Jakarta as well.

The United States, represented in New Delhi by President Joe Biden has expressed disappointment with China’s no-show. Its tacit and active support to Russia in the conduct of the Ukraine War, along with its belligerent satellite North Korea, is of particular concern. America has also criticised China’s latest bizarre ‘standard map’ that not only claims various territories in India and along the South China Sea, but seeks to disrupt the ‘rules-based-world-order’.

A number of affected countries at ASEAN, and here at the G20 Summit, along with Bharat, have condemned the new Chinese map and China’s attempt at muscle flexing.

Bharat pulled out all the stops to set the environs with flowers and fountains, a spanking new state-of-the-art venue, the host hotels tricked out to be at the top of their game, the approaches, monuments, selected shopping locations, Bharat’s proud digital accomplishments and processes, enormous security preparations, were all decked out in celebratory mode. This comes at the culmination of some 40 meetings of the G20 spread out all over the country.

Inside and outside the summit venue, Bharat’s 5,000 plus year old history and culture was showcased. It was replete with magnificent statues of a number of Hindu Gods. Prime Minister Modi received the honoured guests in front of a replica of the Konarak Wheel from the Sun Temple in Odisha. A massive 27 feet high dancing Nataraja made of Ashtadhatu, fronts the G20 venue dubbed a  Bharat Mandapam.

There is considerable consensus on matters like Climate Change, alternate energy development, and opportunities for the Global South. But the Ukraine War has the US and the G7 countries in a mood to insert a critical reference against Russia in the Declaration expected at the end of the Summit tomorrow the 10th of September 2023. Russia says a political reference has no place in a G21 economic summit.

Russia, of course, sees the Ukraine War very differently. China and India are not willing to condemn Russia unilaterally for their own reasons. India has called for dialogue to resolve the conflict and has long been saying for long that this is not a time for War. At this summit, Prime Minister Modi referred to a ‘trust deficit’ without once mentioning Ukraine, implying a solution can be found through dialogue.

The paragraph on Ukraine has been left blank by the Sherpas working on the draft declaration. This even as nuanced drafting aimed at a consensus is continuing. Will this scuttle a joint declaration at the end of the summit?

India has had both the USSR and its successor Russia as a steadfast ally and friend for decades, and some 50% of its military equipment is of Russian/Soviet origin. This has been complemented with sourcing from the US, France, Israel in recent years, and more and more emphasis on aatmanirbhar or joint venture manufacturing in Bharat.

If there is an element of peevishness and desire to steal India’s thunder that has caused Chinese President Xi Jinping to stay away from this summit, and the one in Jakarta, it is probably working against China.

Without Xi Jinping adding his sour glowering presence, displayed recently at Johannesburg for the BRICS Summit, there is no great loss. At Johannesburg, the addition of nine new members through consensus amongst the five existing members, by 1st January 2024 did nor quite go per the Chinese plan. It robbed China of its desire to dominate the forum with just two or three additions of its own choice.

Chinese government mouthpieces such as The Global Times seem to be portraying the Chinese mood today, with its sniping against the New Delhi summit from Beijing.

The question in many minds is just how much trouble is Xi Jinping in, given his poor handling of the Chinese economy and his diplomatic wolf warrior tactics that has almost every country exasperated. He has been called out by his mentor amongst others, and under pressure, has attempted to deny responsibility for the current state of affairs.

The G21 has also announced a railway-based land/port connectivity project involving Saudi Arabia, the UAE, the US and Bharat. This new initiative is also likely to check growing Chinese influence in West Asia.

Brazil will take over the leadership of the G21 after the 10th of September for the next year.

Prime Minister Modi is working through as many as 15 bilateral meetings and some pull-asides during these three days, ever since the leaders started to arrive on 8th September. The bilateral with the US reportedly will advance defence cooperation and joint venturing beyond the GE 414 fighter engine deal with 80% technology transfer, and those for the Predator drones.

The one with Bangladesh illustrates the most successful relationship with a neighbouring country. Various others will each advance Bharat’s strategic partnership with its counterparts.

Initiatives to corner economic fugitives, confiscate their properties and freeze their bank accounts are likely to be internationally agreed. Bharat’s digital payment systems may be adopted by as many as a dozen countries.

Amongst all this, the retreat of China from the reformist gathering, despite the presence of Premier Li, may well be marking a watershed moment.

(1,332 words)

September 9th, 2023

For: Firstpost/News18.com

Gautam Mukherjee

Wednesday, August 23, 2023

 

India Assumes Centre-Stage In BRICS As China Loses Influence

It is ironic that China should now be playing second-fiddle to India in both the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO) and BRICS. This is not admitted to by either side, but perceptually it is increasingly evident.

India held the rotating chair in the SCO for a year most successfully till it ended recently, and appears to be dominating the agenda at the BRICS Summit in Johannesburg too.

So much so, that while India’s Narendra Modi pointed out that it will soon be a $ 5 trillion economy open to do business with the Global South and others, Xi Jinping of China did not make a speech, and stayed away from the Business Session attended by the other three.

President Putin joined in virtually from Moscow. This is the first in-person Summit of BRICS since 2019. Prime Minister Modi called India the growth engine of the world in an unabashed pitch to over 40 countries present, and the global audience via coverage of the three-day event ongoing.

Russia is represented by its highly experienced Foreign Minister Lavrov. It complained, as expected, about the Western sanctions imposed on it, but pledged support to the Global South, and Africa in particular. If President Putin was referring to grain shipments, Africa will note that those too were disrupted more than once.

India is more credible in this matter, because of its timely help with vaccines during the Covid pandemic, while most others, including the rich Western countries, hoarded their own supplies. Its treatment of the many additional invitees to the G20 Summit approaching its climax next month is also much appreciated by the Global South and indeed most of the G 7 as well including Japan and France.

Xi did attend the retreat for the heads of government, but, reading between the lines, did not make any headway with China’s bid to expand the BRICS line- up immediately. China wants to form a larger block to rival the domination of the ‘Global Commons’ regime, helmed by the US. However, previous attempts ranging from the post-colonial Non-Aligned movement to the G 15 have never been effective. A line-up of about 45 countries in BRICS is unlikely to do any better.

This ‘Commons’ regime refers to the dominance of the US dollar as a global reserve currency, the SWIFT system as the international method of banking money flows, free and open access to the trade waterways of the high seas. It also includes America’s established hold on a number of global institutions, defence cooperation-oriented organisations, such as NATO, AUKUS and QUAD.

Any attempt to go beyond talking about a BRICS currency is unrealistic. India has made headway in trading bilaterally in local currencies with a number of countries, but this too is hampered with not enough presence in global trade. As India’s economy grows, the rupee will gain greater acceptance in international trade, said  Columbia University professor and economist Arvind Panagariya in a recent article.

China, by way of contrast, could not properly float its external Yuan as an exchange currency and has been struggling to make something of the Regional Comprehensive Economic Partnership (RCEP), an Asia-Pacific based trade pact, akin to a common market. Many in it are chafing at direction from China which tends to advantage it, and India, of course, has refused to join just as it refused to join China’s Belt and Road initiative. This was prescient because it has severely stressed or bankrupted those who have.

India, under Modi, since 2014, has been joining and participating in other regional meetings of organisations such as the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN). These are influential, but not subject to outright Chinese domination. It is also making every effort in BIMSTEC, particularly with Bangladesh and Sri Lanka, the successor, more or less to SAARC, that has been stymied by Pakistan. Relations with Nepal too are getting better with its infatuation with Chinese Communism on the decline.

India is trying hard to reduce its trade with, and investment from, China. Moves like the licencing of the manufacture of laptops and other electronic items is a step in this direction.

Given the eyeball-to-eyeball confrontation of over 50,000 troops with massive deployment of military equipment on each side along the Line of Actual Control (LaC), the relationship between India and China is not good.

Intrusions and illegal holding of perceived Indian territory in Eastern Ladakh, actual skirmishes and clashes in Ladakh and in Arunachal Pradesh, make up an adverse list, alongside Chinese training, arming and funding of multiple insurgencies in India. Chinese encouragement of Pakistani terrorism is also a huge problem, as is its blocking of Indian initiatives against terrorists in the UN. China has also blocked Indian membership in the Nuclear Suppliers Group.

Chinese companies that have been operating in India have been caught evading taxes and breaking rules. Most Chinese companies are now banned from making investments in India. China itself has also broken international trading rules after joining the World Trade Organisation (WTO).

Indian diplomacy has been candid in stating the relationship with China is at present not normal and cannot be given the circumstances. Even today China is regularly menacing the Philippines, Vietnam, Taiwan and Japan in its near neighbourhood.

Against this backdrop, the possibility of a bilateral meeting at Johannesburg between Prime Minister Narendra Modi and President Xi Jinping is unlikely and rather pointless.

However, both are conducting many bilateral meetings with the other BRICS members and over 40 invited countries, many of whom want to join BRICS.

Prime Minister Narendra Modi in Johannesburg also called for the building of a ‘resilient supply chain’ a diplomatic code also used by the Americans to reduce dependence on China.

China, on its part complained rather bitterly of US ‘hegemony’, and hostility towards the poorer countries of the Global South. While this may seem incongruous in a BRICS Summit, perhaps it is trying to claw-back some vestiges of its global image that has taken a severe battering of late.

Not only is China regarded as the villain of the piece with regard to the global Covid pandemic that has taken millions of lives, but its plummeting economy, huge unemployment, collapsing companies, and chronic belligerence has  put off most of the world. African countries have been expelling the Chinese for their arrogant, racist, and predatory ways. Most of the world is losing faith with China’s ambitions given its sharp decline.

The only economy that is growing strongly amongst the five present members of BRICS is India’s. And India has apparently persuaded the other two present, namely Brazil’s Lula da Silva and South Africa’s Cyril Ramaphosa to agree to a process for expanding the BRICS line-up first. 

The Shanghai-based BRICS Bank, formally known as the New Development Bank, has failed to rival the major US backed multilateral lending institutions such as the World Bank, the International Monetary Fund (IMF), The Asian Development Bank (ADB) and others.

India is a darling to these institutions, with its approximately 7 % GDP growth year on year. It is called a ‘beacon of hope’ in a world troubled economically at present.

President Biden has stated that he considers India to be the most important country to him, in the backdrop of this BRICS Summit, and will be visiting New Delhi shortly between 7-9 September for the G 20 Summit, along with a host of other heads of government. His announced agenda at the G20 is to condemn Russia for the Ukraine War.

 This 15th Summit of BRICS was preceded by Prime Minister Modi pointing out the need to identify new areas of cooperation.

Prime Minister Modi will go on to Greece on the 25th from South Africa for a day long visit on his return path to India. Greece is offering a gateway to Europe for India, even as it has been interacting closely with rival China in recent years after its economy went bankrupt and was rescued by its membership of the EU and massive new loans.

Like the rivalry in BRICS and SCO, India and China will continue to compete with each other in the global arena, and in economy-oriented organisations like these. This will have multiple effects on the geopolitics of the world, but India’s economy, much smaller than China as present, is assured of medium to long-term success. This is mainly because of an alignment with America and its Western allies that give it an edge in security matters. Its largely aatmanirbhar economy, backed by strong domestic demand and proportionate exports, is poised to make it become the 3rd biggest in the world by 2028-2030. After that its numbers won’t stay very much smaller than those of the Chinese economy, presently at No.2.

(1,446 words)

August 23rd, 2023

For: Firstpost/News18.com

Gautam Mukherjee

Saturday, August 12, 2023

 

A Shambolic Debut On the National Stage For the Opposition Alliance of 26 Parties

Now that the Monsoon Session of Parliament has ended in the old building while the new one awaits use after its inauguration; we could talk about the A.L.L.I.A.N.C.E coming-out party. It took the form of a farcical No Confidence Motion that was a damp squib.

The ostensible reason was to force the prime minister to speak out on the troubles in Manipur. What the Opposition alliance did not bargain for is that the treasury benches would wipe the floor with them on matters including Manipur, but much more in an adverse vein particularly against the Congress. Home Minister Amit Shah’s two-hour explanation with detailed facts and figures on what is being done by the government in Manipur gave a comprehensive report not only to the ill-prepared opposition but the nation at large.

Much hysteria was displayed by this opposition with its single point agenda, including some trademark childishness from the SC restored Rahul Gandhi, and a banshee like performance by Mohua Moitra from the TMC. There was another bull-in-a-china shop effort by Derek O Brien from the self-same party also, but this was in the Rajya Sabha.

The prime minister spoke last in reply, and rendered a masterful and magisterial speech of over one-and-a-half hours. This was on parliamentary history, the shameless projection of the ‘parivaar’ over every other contributor towards nation-building, the consistent shortcomings of the Congress Party in its handling of the North East, the accomplishments of his own government in nine years, the naked power-hungriness of the opposition alliance, and Manipur specifically too. It was so searing in its content that the Opposition alliance shuffled out of the Lok Sabha like so many convicts in a chain gang. They came back for the voting, but they might as well not have bothered.

Adhiranjan Chowdhury, once a fiery street speaker cum rabble-rouser from West Bengal, and since a prominent leader in the Lok Sabha for Congress, was suspended till a Privileges Committee goes into the matter. Likewise, AAP’s Raghav Chadha, who apparently forged the signatures of four MPs from other parties for an intended Select Committee that never took off.  Derek O Brien was suspended too, but allowed back in later by the Rajya Sabha Chairman Jagdeep Dhankar.

The entire three-day tamasha was televised on most Indian news channels and analysed every evening by expert panellists and despairing anchors who might have hoped for a less unequal fight. As usual, the vitriol continued through the wounded Congress spokespersons.

After it was all over in parliament, one broadly pro-Congress channel even put out a confused poll. Because the polled, who might have been opposition supporters, were still unable to say much in favour of the opposition alliance. I.N.D.I.A is scheduled to meet again in Mumbai at the end of August, but it is likely the AAP will skip it.

What did this No-Confidence Vote exercise achieve? It certainly made the government and the treasury benches look much better than their accusers.

Will it contribute towards the winnability of the I.N.D.I.A Alliance in the forthcoming assembly elections and the general elections in 2024? Doubtful. It was, in fact a disastrous first outing.

The return of Rahul Gandhi to parliament as a for-the-time-being restored MP, complicates the pitch for other prime ministerial aspirants in the opposition alliance. Nitish Kumar has reportedly managed to secure the post of Convenor as a stepping stone for his own bid. There are doubts being expressed by some analysts on the cohesion of I.N.D.I.A till the general elections. In Bihar, the JDU/JDS combine may not sustain in one piece. Will both bits stick with the opposition alliance if a break up does occur?

The Congress needs to up its Lok Sabha seat tally to at least 100 MPs in order to become the undeniable anchor. While it is the only party with pan-India recognition in the combine, its electoral prospects are not inspiring. Rahul Gandhi’s visibility may have increased since the Bharat Jodo Yatra but his vision for India is a retrograde one. He merely wants to preserve the Nehruvian Idea of India. His own contribution seems to a sharp tilt towards the minorities, including the extremists amongst them. The Congress Party links with China and Pakistan are also exposed and fairly obvious. Rahul Gandhi is travelling to Europe once again in September to drum up support from more anti-Modi forces. He will, no doubt, also describe conditions in Indian democracy in the most dire terms.

It is unlikely that the Indian voter, beyond the Congress’ fairly narrow supporter base, will take kindly to this strategy. More so, when it is contrasted with Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s highly effective global diplomatic outreach, supported ably by the External Affairs Minister, and increasingly, the National Security Adviser.

India’s continued rise as an economic power and reliable partner is being seen as an alternative to a declining China, for trade, manufacturing, and defence purposes. Even the leadership of BRICS, started originally alongside China. Russia, Brazil, is turning more towards India for its future direction and induction of likely additional members, such as the UAE and Saudi Arabia. BRICS is no longer keen to push the Chinese agenda, if it ever was, with its aim to dominate America, while others in the combine were expected to fall-in with it.

The lack of a national and global vision in the opposition alliance beyond the overthrow of the BJP and NDA is going to hurt its prospects. It sometimes talks of unemployment, price rise, per capita income, cronyism, but does not sustain it. Neither does it have any solutions. It bases its campaigns on AAP style freebies, which resonate with the poor in the voting public. But they invariably have trouble fulfilling promises and sustain development if voted to power.

However, ten years in power at the Centre is bound to throw up a certain amount of anti-incumbency for the ruling NDA. On the plus side, Narendra Modi’s personal popularity, charisma, and commitment to the nation, will counterbalance this. Prime Minister Modi, who will be 75 in 2025, is in good health and likely to complete another five-year term in office to execute his vision. He has repeatedly pledged that India will be the No.3 economy in the world by 2028, and will do everything possible to keep the momentum towards this objective.

At present, the chances of a third consecutive term with a majority in favour of the BJP and the NDA seem very bright.       

(1,074 words)

August 12th, 2023

For: Firstpost/News18

Gautam Mukherjee

 

Saturday, July 29, 2023

 

Will Additional Global Conflict In Europe & Between China And America Catapult India Forward?

What is the Space-Eye-view of our situation on earth? Or can one only see a golf ball sized planet in just this one galaxy?  

Space is the new frontier. Exploration, intended exploitation of minerals, the search for water, territory fit to inhabit, possible space wars, all loom large. It is shaping up to be much more than sending up satellites to watch the earth and facilitate communications. More than the to-ing and fro-ing of tourists on spaceships and putting in space stations for research.

Are we actually in a space race from the same earthly motivations of power play? That same ‘March of Nations’ postulated by the complex 19th century German thinker and philosopher Georg Wilhelm Friedrich Hegel (1770-1831).  His Hegelian Dialectic, about the rubbing against each other, of nations, was a far grander concept than that of the unemployed theoretician Marx. Karl Marx (1818-1883), lifted the concept of the Hegelian Dialectic and corrupted it, into a mere tussle between Labour and Capital.

Hegel said the history of the world is moved forward by different dominant nations at different times. Certainly, we can see how the once mighty Romans did so. And more recently, the British Empire, growing ever more extensive till the sun never set on it. But right within it, at its zenith, the seeds of change were planted. This was in the reign of Queen Victoria.

The royal families of Europe were populated by the several Germanic sons and daughters of Queen Victoria and their cousins. Of these, a notable rivalry grew between her heir-apparent and eldest son Bertie, The Price of Wales (1841-1910), who became Edward VII after her, and the last Kaiser of Germany, Wilhelm II (1859 -1941), who reigned from 1888 to 1918, when he had to abdicate.

Germany wanted dominion over Western Europe and the high seas of the world. And after Queen Victoria died in 1901, at the end of a reign spanning 63 years and 216 days, this rivalry sharpened, as both countries prepared for war.

This rivalry was neither ordinary or harmless. It was reminiscent of that described in the monumental Indian epic, the Mahabharata. The one that destroyed the Kshatriya regal domination forever.

There was enormous jealousy in Germany, and a desire to turn the tables on Britain. This turned into friction in the first decade of the 20th century when Bertie became Edward VII. WWI came as early as 1914, with the spark ignited at Sarajevo when Archduke Franz Ferdinand, the heir presumptive to the throne of Austria, was assassinated by Gavrilo Princip, a 19 year-old member of Young Bosnia.

The events that followed in rapid succession  would change the entire landscape of Europe irrevocably.

Besides the Archduke, the first of the European royals to leave the stage was another cousin of Edward VII, the absolute monarch, Tsar of the Russias, Nicholas II.

Tsar Nicholas II, the last of the Romanovs, ruled from 1894, till he was overthrown (1917), and assassinated with his entire family by the members of the Bolshevik Revolution (1918). This was a profound development, because Imperial Russia was the largest and richest country in Europe.

The fun-loving Bertie, almost forever the Prince of Wales, became Edward VII but not for long. His short reign of just under a decade did not permit him to personally witness the start of WWI, or the deposition and murder of his cousin Nicholas.

The period from the dawn of the 20th century, saw cataclysmic changes for the old order. It went on right till the end of WWII in 1945. In these 45 years, the world order was altered drastically. Millions of people of all races and creeds from Europe and the Empire were killed in the two world wars. And for both wars, the March of Nations chose Germany as the main protagonist.  

1901-45 witnessed the end of agrarianism as the basis of the world economy. It decimated the ranks of the aristocracy that generally led in war from the front. It ended inflation that had stayed incomprehensibly rock solid at just 4% over a hundred years. It practically finished the gold standard. It buried slavery and colonialism. It heralded the death of Empire and the Imperial Age.

In short, it ushered in the take-over of a much more egalitarian, democratic, industrial and mercantilist era, based on new products and technology seen for the first time. The pulse of the world quickened, and the globe began to grow smaller.

America became the greatest, most powerful, and wealthy country in the world. The post WWII order held for decades, with the Western and Soviet Blocks competing for dominance. This was surely the third coming of the March of Nations, with America emerging as the dominant global power.  

The challenge from the Soviet block eventually proved unequal to the task, as the Warsaw Pact broke down, and the Berlin Wall was demolished, before the USSR itself was dismantled.

Communism revived though, via the rise of China, aided and abetted for decades by America, creating its own Frankenstein monster in the process.

But the promise of the Communist Internationale and World dominion died early with the demise of the Soviet Union. But does China under Xi Jinping, a revivalist Mao Zedong in temperament, realise it? In this hubris, like that of Kaiser Wilhelm II and Adolf Hitler, lie the seeds of its own destruction. The March of Nations has caused China to rub up against the West, but it will be lost at sea because it is not destined to rule the world.

The baton truly passed from a Pax Britannica, after a paroxysm of blood, to a Pax Americana. Both echo a long ago Pax Romana that lasted 200 years between 27 BC and 180 AD centred in Rome in the West, before passing on to Constantinople for another 200 years.

We are now on the brink of a new phase of the Hegelian march, minus China in the ascendant. The nuclear deterrent is still holding since WWII, but the first war in Europe has arrived in over seventy years. This is not with the USSR, as might have been expected, but its rump, the Russian Republic.

This is proving most debilitating for the NATO/EU/allied countries. Inflation is rampant. Growth is down. Unemployment stalks the streets. This even though it is a proxy war via the Ukrainians. The stubborn Russian Federation refuses to yield. The West won’t give it what it wants. But the prolongation of the conflict is drawing Russia ever closer into a Chinese embrace.

The most destabilising and dangerous thing about the war in Ukraine is that it  ostensibly goes  much beyond it. The West is determined to destroy Russian power once and for all. While Russia, a huge country and a formidable military power, in alliance with China, its satellite North Korea and a much-debilitated Pakistan, is doing its best to resist.

Pakistan, long used to being subsidised by America and then China, will be the first of the three to break into pieces, because of its enormous mountain of debt. This could come even before the end of the present decade.

China will lose its proxy partner in its battle for domination of India, weakening it. This, even as its own economy, grown from nothing by its dependence on exports to the West is also reeling under enormous debt. The Chinese economy is destined to keep getting worse as the world no longer trusts it. Its supply chains are moving to other countries, including India.

The resultant economic turmoil amongst the people of China will cause them to challenge the CPC once again. This time it won’t be easy to put down. This unrest could lead to a break up of China as well, starting with all territories beyond the Han heartland. This is likely in the early 2030s.

But perhaps not before China tries to dominate the situation by going to war with America. The spark will probably be lit over its attempted invasion of Taiwan and blockading of the South and East China Seas.   

No nuclear weapons will still be used because of its guaranteed zero-sum game.

China will, of course, lose the conventional war with America and its allies which include the QUAD, AUKUS and NATO.

Russia will descend into a less influential power post this debacle, with the loss of its Chinese ally, just as the West intends.

India meanwhile will develop into a substantial military power over the next decade, and be able to defend its borders against China and Pakistan. The latter may also attempt another war, egged on by China. But this will only hasten its break-up. PoK and Gilgit-Baltistan will return to the Indian fold. America will diplomatically, via its intelligence services, and militarily, back India, along with its Western allies, in taking over PoK and Gilgit-Baltistan. Not only do the territories belong to it in the first place, but America will back India in delivering a body blow to both Pakistan and China. This would be accomplished without America having to put its boots on the ground.

China’s CPEC, already in economic trouble, will fail with the loss of PoK. The Siachen Glacier and Chinese roads to Tibet will be compromised. The damaging of access to Tibet will be the beginning of its eventual liberation in the 2030s.

The shape of things to come is evident, as India is being created into a sophisticated fighting force by the West with its liberal transfer of high technology in defence. It is also being supported in other areas such as semiconductors and Artificial Intelligence. This will certainly strengthen India by filling in the gaps and chinks.  For the West, it will place a formidable fighting force across the bows of a belligerent China that has fought no real wars.

India will participate in and oversee the defence of the Indian Ocean, the Arabian Sea, the Bay of Bengal and the Malacca Straits. It will join hands with the QUAD/AUKUS and France to defend  South Asia  and the Asia-Pacific.

When all this is over in less than a decade from today, India will truly emerge as a legitimate super power. Will it be leading the March of Nations?  It will certainly reach No.3 economy status, or is it No.2, with a vast increase both in GDP and influence. America will retain its position at No.1 and its technological ascendancy in the world.

The intervening period will be dominated by the BJP in power throughout, carried over the threshold in 2024 by the visionary and charismatic Narendra Modi.

Longer term, the present challenges to its emergence as a Hindu Rashtra that carries its minorities with humanity and justice will fall away for good under his successors.

(1,787 words)

July 29th, 2023

For: Firstpost/News18.com

Gautam Mukherjee

 

 

 

Wednesday, July 26, 2023

 

NDA Vs I.N.D.I.A. Is Majoritarian Nationalism Plus Economic Prosperity Against Liberal Minorityism & Classic Socialism

 

While the film version of pink and sky-blue hued Barbie is trumping Oppenheimer in the United States box office takes, it is Oppenheimer, the biographical thriller written and directed by Christopher Nolan, that is leading in India.

The reference to a phrase from the Bhagavad Gita, the revered Hindu text that Oppenheimer read compulsively to overcome his moral dilemma at becoming the instrument of so much death and destruction, may have something to do with the interest in India.

Both Robert Oppenheimer, a Jew, and Werner Heisenberg, gentile, a Lutheran Christian, set about building the world’s first nuclear bomb using their knowledge quantum physics. 

Heisenberg was one of the youngest people to win the Nobel prize for Physics in 1931. He had authored The Uncertainty Principle on the behaviour of sub-atomic particles in 1927.

Robert Oppenheimer succeeded in building the atomic bomb at the head of a crack team of scientists tucked away in Los Alamos, New Mexico, on behalf of America and its Allies. His motivation, ostensibly was to end the war, in which he definitely succeeded, though the question remains whether the use of an atomic bomb, or two of them, was actually necessary to this end. The decision was President Harry S Truman’s, a former general himself, and not Oppenheimer’s, of course.

Heisenberg worked on behalf of Nazi Germany, but was apparently a patriot and not a Nazi. He could not, or it is suggested, deliberately did not, build the Nazi bomb, even though the Nazi programme started first in 1938. Heisenberg and his team of scientists steered their work towards peaceful nuclear reactors to produce energy instead. It is also suggested that the resources needed, beyond 1200 tons of uranium supplied from occupied Belgium, could not be provided in 1942, when the go-ahead for the bomb was received, by a beleaguered Germany. 

Werner Karl Heisenberg lived on after the war till 1976, when he died in Munich, regarded till the end as a brilliant man of science. A man who did not build the bomb out of conviction, though his theoretical science, in the very home of quantum physics, was ahead of all others.

This, while Julius Robert Oppenheimer, in America, who also began his mission to build the bomb in 1942, became a haunted man, a pariah as ‘the father of the atomic bomb’. This, after the extent of the devastation wrought from his deadly invention became known.

Oppenheimer was always suspected of Communist sympathies, and this combined with his post-war advocacy against nuclear proliferation, the development of the hydrogen bomb, the nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union, and so on, became a basis for the American power establishment to turn their backs on him.

They also threw him out of coveted university and organisational positions. Oppenheimer still continued to lecture, write and work in physics till the end. He died at the age of 62 in 1967, having been largely reinstated in the graces of the American government, by 1963. He remains, in his legacy, one of the most important figures of the 20th century.  

Oppenheimer’s success led to the dropping of two nuclear bombs on Nagasaki and Hiroshima in Japan by the Americans with months of his proof-of-concept explosion in the Los Alamos desert named Trinity. This effectively led to the surrender of Imperial Japan. Nazi Germany also surrendered in 1945, thereby bringing WWII to a close.

It is seen therefore, from this revived and current tale, how closely success and failure resemble each other.

India is now on a fated path towards the next general election, most likely between March and May 2024. The next eight to ten months will determine whether the Indian electorate gives a third consecutive term to Narendra Modi and the 38-member National Democratic Alliance (NDA). Or will it choose the 27-party opposition combine newly named Indian National Democratic Inclusive Alliance (I.N.D.I.A.). The NDA currently has a comfortable majority in the Lok Sabha and a near majority in the Rajya Sabha too. The opposition combine has approximately 144 seats in the Lok Sabha. Another 91 MPs who sit across the aisle from the NDA are neutral though they often vote along with the NDA on a case-to-case basis.

If the NDA is elected with a clear majority once again for the third consecutive time, then the present policies will receive the boost of continuity. Their plus points principally are a robust, mostly majoritarian nationalism, attention to national defence, infrastructure development, manufacturing, trade, welfarism, and steady, all round economic growth. Inclusiveness, as in Sabka Vikas, Sabka Prayas, is a stated objective, but while government programmes are not discriminatory, it remains to be seen how much of an electoral draw this stance engenders in the polls.

On the other side, the opposition combine is a rickety construct of contradictions united  mostly in its desire to oust the present dispensation. It is something of a do-or-die situation for this combine which accounts for one unrest or the other in these months up to the elections. There are foreign forces in alignment with this opposition who do not relish the continuance of a strong Hindu nationalist government.

While largely made up of regional parties, some of whom such as the DMK, TMC, AAP, JDU/RJD are in power - in Tamil Nadu, West Bengal, Delhi, Punjab and Bihar respectively, most are not. There are multiple contradictions. The CPI(M) are opposed to the TMC in West Bengal, but are in power in Kerala. The Congress is in power in Karnataka, Himachal Pradesh, Rajasthan, Chhattisgarh and are a coalition partner in Jharkhand. This, could, of course, grow in the forthcoming assembly elections in Madhya Pradesh and elsewhere to be held before the general elections. How many seats this large combine gets in the new Lok Sabha, and from where, will determine the prime ministerial candidate. Congress is clearly ahead of all others, and will be, if all goes well, in pole position to nominate the future prime minister, should I.N.D.I.A. come within striking distance of a cobbled-together majority. It will work on a common minimum programme.

Past experience shows that unless there is an anchoring party with about 150 seats, such coalitions rapidly collapse in a matter of a few months. Besides, should the NDA be forced to sit on the opposition benches, it will be hyperactive to try and bring the ruling coalition down at the earliest.

As for its economics and politics, it is certain to favour the minorities whose votes the opposition combine is likely to get in large numbers, and reward them with populist sops. This will affect the momentum of the economy but make for happier voters. Much of the liberal socialist ethos pushed aside by the NDA will be quickly restored.

Democracy works on the will of the people and therefore either continuity or change, including a change that seeks to go back a distance to what it considers first principles, will have to be accepted. The present wisdom suggests the opposition has little chance of coming to power, but the upset of 2004 when India was ostensibly shining cannot be forgotten.

 (1,184 words)

July 26th, 2023

For: Firstpost/News18.com

Gautam Mukherjee