Regime
Change Ushers In A New Current Affairs Narrative
‘You
can’t go back and change the beginning, but you can start where you are and
change the ending’ -C.S. Lewis, author -Chronicles of Narnia
Regime
change is the harbinger of a spring cleaning. It brings about, as if by magic,
a new current affairs narrative, seemingly unhampered by the burdens of the
past. Yet there is a link retained, so as to not shock the body politic. In
elected governments, there are the voters to reward, their expectations to
meet. How different are they from the establishment of the past depends on the
margin of victory, the difference of vote shares between the winners and
losers. In countries like India with multiple cultures, languages, regions,
religions, how different parts and states therein voted, and what this
information suggests, must be taken into account.
In more autocratic set-ups, there is the
vision of the latest strong man to implement. Is he stronger than the one he
seeks to emulate? Is Xi Jinping a better Mao Ze Dong? Is the China of 2022,
with its muscularity but faltering economy, better than decades before - under
the guidance of Premier Deng Ziao Ping
for example? Or is there need for course
correction, to revert to the discretion and humility of the Deng era. Is the
Mao period, strategically brilliant but tumultuous, resulting in millions of
deaths in peacetime, worth emulating afresh?
In the
former, the democracies, the side-lining of the emphases laid by the previous
governments, if ideologically at variance, begins slowly but gains momentum. If
a second consecutive term is won, the moves become more assertive. The losing
parties grow more desperate, fretting about the long spell without significant
political power. They chafe at the lack of fresh pelf and patronage that goes
with it. The urge to decry achievements of the sitting government grows more
insistent. The lies and propaganda employed grow more lurid. Vilification is a
daily occurrence, just this side of rank abuse. Effectiveness however is at a
premium, sitting on top of essential despair.
Autocratic
regimes purge their opponents and dissidents without ceremony. Defanging or
eliminating potential enemies is believed to be good statecraft.
A would-be
regime change unfolding before us in Ukraine, seeks to undo the harm done to
Russian interests over three decades. But it see-saws like a nursery rhyme
Marjorie Daw.
Joseph
Stalin, speaking in his time, said, ‘At this point the question of Ukraine is
the most important. The situation in Ukraine is very bad. If we don’t take
steps now to improve the situation, we may lose Ukraine. The objective should
be to transform Ukraine, in the shortest period of time, into a real fortress
of the USSSR.’ Nothing much seems to have changed in Russia’s thinking in over
seven decades.
Ukraine was
a founder member of the Soviet Union in1922. When it became independent in
1991, it largely stayed in the Russian camp. This changed because of Western
whisperers, but the Russian Bear was not pleased. It has been a game of musical
chairs ever since - a Soviet lackey, replaced by a NATO one, and now, it is
about to see-saw back into Russia’s arms.
Do the
people of Ukraine want to be Russian again. It won’t be allowed to matter,
because it didn’t when the West installed Zelensky to run its ‘client state’
either.
The sinister
thing from Moscow’s perspective has been the creep of NATO eastwards, drawing
one former Soviet satellite after another into its net, and quite often that of
the EU. Russian protests were ignored all the while. The spirit of the
agreements at the dissolution of the Soviet Union, said Mikhail Gorbachev, has
been violated.
What’s going
on now is exemplified by NATO member Bulgaria, who know the Russians very well,
refusing to send military equipment to Kiev. It is sending humanitarian aid,
but does not want to be party to fighting Russia.
The Russian
Ambassador to Bosnia and Herzegovina, Igor Kalabukhov, said Russia would
‘respond to the threat’ of Bosnia and Herzegovina possibly joining NATO.
Kalabukhov told Bosnian TV, ‘How do you know that we are not planning anything
against Croatia, Hungary or Poland. We have plans against NATO. We estimate the
geo-strategic situation, we look at where the threats come from and react.’ The three countries Kalabukhov mentioned are
already in NATO. This is the uncertain calculus going forward that NATO must
take into account.
The last
buffer state between the NATO countries and Russia, Ukraine, is flat, easy to
blitzkrieg through. But with Russia in control of it, this cannot be done
without unaffordable attrition.
Here too,
the non-implementation of the Minsk Accord of 2014-2015, at the behest of the
West, is the culprit. This is why the Luhansk and Donetsk Republics declared
their independence immediately recognised by Russia before it went into Ukraine
on 24th February 2022. That, and the constant military menacing of
this Russian speaking Donbass region for over a decade by a Ukraine
administration, flattered by NATO, EU and US attention.
There is
resistance in Ukraine, unlike the altogether more cynical and pragmatic Afghan
Army, armed to the teeth by the Americans. The Afghans melted away in days,
along with their leader gone into exile, abandoning their country to the
Taliban.
Ukraine, by
way of contrast, is using its training from the NATO trainers as well as its
NATO given weaponry. But this is inadequate, and has resulted in city after
city and all national assets being reduced to rubble. It has brought calamity
on the heads of millions of ordinary Ukrainians and triggered a refugee exodus.
If Ukraine refuses to surrender, lay down all
arms, demilitarise, and toe the Russian line that demands its future
neutrality, it will stay under the direct occupation of Russia. And Russia in
turn will be poised on the border of multiple NATO countries and others, such
as Finland.
The West,
with enormous resources, armaments and institutional influence, plans to defend
NATO territory against a nuclear weaponised Russia. But it has been given pause
by Russia’s effective hypersonic missiles used for the first time in war by any
power.
America has
raised a bogey that Russia may use chemical and biological weapons next. Both
sides seem to echo John Milton’s Paradise Lost, when he wrote, ‘Better to reign
in Hell, than to serve in Heaven’.
Back home
here in India, there has been a considerable change in the political,
ideological and current affairs narrative since the BJP/NDA under Prime
Minister Narendra Modi came to power in 2014. It began slowly but now there are
many road-markers in the seven and a half years since, that challenge the
surreptitious insertion of the words ‘Socialist’ and ‘Secular’ into the
preamble of the Indian Constitution during the infamous Emergency.
These words
were gradually weaponised to effect a prejudicial and uneven playing field for
the Hindus to aid the Congress Party’s vote bank politics. In addition, every
attempt was made from the very first in 1947, to divide and rule the many
castes and sub castes, even while pampering the minorities. The idea was to
prevent the Hindus from ever uniting as a voting force.
Text books
written by Marxists spuriously suggesting that Indian history began with the
arrival of the Mughals were taught to Indian children for generations. Hindu
festivals and cultural practices were criticised and mocked by favoured
intellectuals and government promoted celebrities. Of late, Woke definitions,
absolute and insulting distortions, were introduced to test the water via
advertisements put out by corporate entities.
But the
great push back that began in 2014 has gained momentum. For the first time
since the Seventies, ‘The Idea of India’ promoted by the Nehru-Gandhi clan is
being dismantled at every turn by Narendra Modi’s cry of a ‘New India’. Hindus
are speaking up. The government has
looked at sinecures and government appointments in various official and
semi-official capacities and in schools and colleges, in order to correct
biases. The NCERT books are being rewritten.
The
erstwhile semi-autonomous state of J&K has been amalgamated into the Indian
Republic. The over a century old dispute on the Ram Temple at Ayodhya has been
resolved, and the grand temple is now being built. In addition, the whole of
Ayodhya is being transformed to suit.
The Kashi-Vishwanath Temple and corridor in Varanasi has been built with
many facilities. The ancient Ghats at Varanasi, the oldest living city in the
world, have been renovated. Other infrastructure such as its railway station
has also been transformed. The road network to the Char Dhams in Uttarakhand
have been upgraded. Connectivity by road and rail with modern facilities have
been created to Katra and the Mata Vaisnodevi Shrine. The judiciary is
beginning to hear petitions on the
encroachment of the Sri Krishna Janmasthan Temple at Mathura.
A proud
Hindu government is doing spectacular restitution that has been denied since
the Indian Republic was formed.
The
government has, at the same time, sought to be even-handed by removing the
practice of instant triple talaq which, to an extent, earned the gratitude of
oppressed Muslim women.
In true
secular fashion, as opposed to its distorted version from earlier times, many
things have been implemented that benefit everyone in the country. Infrastructure
by way of new highways, tunnels, bridges, inner city improvements, agricultural
canals, new techniques, EVs, have been proceeding at a fast pace. The neglected
North East of the country has been brought into the mainstream. The Indian Railways
have been overhauled, electrified and modernised. Rapid Rail Networks, Bullet
trains and dedicated freight corridors have begun to actuate. Many new cities
have now received functioning Metro systems and the older existing networks
have been expanded and bettered. Ports have been upgraded and both sea and
riverine cargo and passenger transport systems have been refreshed.
Digitisation
has made greater progress in India than many advanced nations. Aatmanirbhar
manufacturing is growing dynamically in the defence, electronics, IT and AI
sectors. Start-ups and Unicorns are being born at a fast pace for the first
time. With the privatisation of Air India, a number of other large divestments
and part privatisation of government assets is on the anvil.
If this is
pleasing to the middle classes and foreign investors, the targeted welfarism
for the poor include the building of toilets, provision of cooking gas,
electricity, water on tap, rural roads, wi-fi connectivity, pucca housing for
the poor, support prices for agricultural produce and freedom to sell anywhere
for the small farmer, and a much improved law and order situation. All this has
earned the appreciation of the masses.
So, by
popular demand, the Hindu Nationalist government is well established. This is reflected
by the popularity of Narendra Modi and the BJP leadership, and the continued
electoral success with no sign of anti-incumbency.
India’s
international standing under Prime Minister Modi has also reached new heights.
Our enemies on the borders have been checked. The GDP growth trajectory after
two difficult years spent battling the Covid pandemic very successfully, is
once again in the region of 9% per annum. Exports are growing strongly, and
foreign exchange reserves are at an all-time high.
It is a
narrative that is very different from before 2014. Should the same BJP led
combine win again in 2024, the movement towards a Hindu Rashtra inclusive of a constitutional change if
necessary will become inevitable. The minorities will find an honourable place
in this New India. But they will have to give up their seditious ways.
Hindu
Rashtra, a national commitment to a State religion, will define and strengthen
India, its military, and its economy. Next to Nepal, which has diluted its
position under Communist influence, it will be the only Hindu nation in the
world. A world full of avowedly Islamic and Christian nations in the main.
Our chances
of becoming a $ 5 trillion economy from the present $3 trillion, and the third
biggest economy in the world soon thereafter at about $10 trillion in GDP, will
brighten. As Lord Krishna states in the Bhagwad Gita, ‘We behold what we are,
and we are what we behold’.
(2,017
words)
March 22nd,
2022
For:
Firstpost
Gautam
Mukherjee
No comments:
Post a Comment