Run Over The Barricades
It is difficult to lay aside a confirmed passion- Catullus
By the time the largely
silent Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao finished rolling out his reforms via
then Finance Minister Manmohan Singh, the Licence-Permit Raj had become
history.
The country was actually
on the point of bankruptcy in 1991, brought on by the heavy borrowings of the
previous five-year-long Rajiv Gandhi administration. The reforms were, in fact,
dictated to India by the World Bank, in return for a sorely needed bail-out. It
made Prime Minister Rao’s given task easier. And it is anybody’s guess where
his own economic instincts lay.
The infamous shipping of
RBI gold to Switzerland during the short-lived Chandra Shekhar administration,
and the permission given to refuel American war planes, when India was on the
point of defaulting on its loans, is not altogether forgotten.
But the moot point today
is that Prime Minister Rao, who had the temerity to keep his own counsel, put
in place and unleashed the energies of a new, liberalised era. One that could not
be rolled back by his successors even if they had wanted to.
Not only that, but after
even another quarter century going on three decades, no further reforms have
quite equalled those unveiled in 1991. Land and labour reforms are still
pending keeping major foreign investment at bay. But, even in 2020, taking on
the many powerful trade unions is no mean task. Just trying to disinvest
money-losing Air India is a multi-headed Hydra, one of which is its unionised
staff.
GST, the reforms in
income tax, company, and trust laws, the bankruptcy code, from Modi 1.0, are
all good economic developments, but they have come in linear progression,
rather than all together, as in 1991.
There is much to be said
for doing what one must as quickly and efficiently as possible despite the
possible fallout. It tends to be epoch-making and the turbulence fades with
time.
The very birth of modern
India is a case in point. Lord Louis Mountbatten, not only India’s Viceroy, but with
plenipotentiary powers, decided to
accelerate and advance the partition of India and independence by many months.
This, before, in his estimation, any fragile agreements he had put together
with the Congress and Muslim League unravelled, and the rioting got a lot
worse.
As it happened, a
sub-continent that had never been a theatre of war under the British Crown,
lost over half a million dead on each side, with millions more dislocated and
impoverished by the loss of all they owned. And yet, Britain has never second-guessed
its decision to pull out of India and Pakistan as rapidly as it did.
Today, India stands at an
ideological and philosophical crossroad once again. To go back is unacceptable
to the millions that support the BJP and its NDA government. There are those
who are not part of the NDA, who are quite willing nevertheless to support its
initiatives in the Rajya Sabha. The upper house is no longer a sticking point
in the passage of legislation. But parliamentary success has had the
consequence of pushing the battle on to the streets.
It is a noisy if
vainglorious challenge that looks better on TV than it does in reality, with
its street-thuggery and arson. But many take it far more seriously.
Still, given that the mayhem is unlikely to
stop throughout this second term, can the government afford to turn back now?
The dramatis personae include the
Libleft, largely stripped of power; the enormous almost 200 million strong Muslim
minority; Maoists, Communists, Socialists. And then, there are the expert
sections of the Opposition backed by inimical foreign powers.
Foreign interests that
include the Pakistanis, with their military, intelligence, and terrorist arms;
the Chinese, clandestinely promoting the Maoists; some Wahhabi forces from West
Asia and other OIC countries; separatist forces of Kashmir and Khalistan
operating from Europe and Canada. These, and also those that do not want India
to make rapid progress, from the West, and elsewhere.
These powers are funding
direct and indirect activism and organising protest too. They have been doing
so for a long time via a tribe of NGOs and madrassas; but the government is
pushing this back too. Yet, it is seen, despite the considerable investment,
that the earlier envelope of minority favouring secularism is torn, and cannot,
it seems, hold fast any more.
With the rapid developments
since May 2019- J&K integrated, the triple Triple Talaq law passed, and the
resolving of the Ram Temple at Ayodhya in favour of the Hindus; the old status
quo is shattered. The pace adopted for the core agenda of the BJP in Modi 2.0
is much faster than in the first term.
Today’s CAA, NPR, NRC
and campus protests orchestrated by agent provocateurs are harbingers of more
landscape altering laws to come. This means that either the government has to
be frightened into retreat right now, or it will steam-roller on to create a
New India- as advertised and promised. The legion of the government’s
supporters are looking forward to a population control act and the Uniform
Civil Code any day soon.
Going back will destroy
the BJP’s credibility with its legions of voters. These are, after all,
ideological and civilisational issues, more important than livelihood and food
in the minds of many.
Paradoxically, it is the
economically much better off middle classes from the Libleft who are fanning
the flames of discontent amongst the Muslims. Some , amongst the Muslim
leadership, if not that of the Communists, have read the writing on the wall. They are therefore exhorting their followers
to fall in line. The tone of the leadership at the politically important Jama
Masjid in Delhi is a case in point. But, there are others who want to take the
battle to the enemy, regardless of the cost. That they are mostly Communists
and Jihadists that have everything to lose is not to be ignored.
However, the latter may
see their bluff called continuously, between now and 2024, till there is
nothing material left of their revolt. The old tactics of intimidation, stone
pelting, sloganeering, arson and occasional murder on the streets will not
carry.
This modern republic has
not been fair to its majority Hindu population. It is remarkable that the
original Constituent Assembly debated the issue of adding “Secular” and “Socialist”
to the Preamble and rejected it. These words were added, without discussion,
much later, during the notorious Emergency of the 1970s.
This present political
construct and narrative from sections of the Opposition cannot be allowed to prevail.
All talk of a polity where majoritarianism must be stamped out probably lost
value decades ago. It was when the minorities, aided and abetted by politicians
dependent on their votes, decided to abuse the covenant.
Today, the feeling is
that it has gone too far. Its fringe elements seek to overthrow the majority
and threaten daily retribution. This wild fantasy can only lead to bitter tears.
Even though Muslims elsewhere, in the West, have typically started a
disproportionate assertion, even at 5% of the population to our 17%. They call
for Sharia Law in Muslim majority areas. This is increasingly resented by the
natives- who are also pushing back.
By the time this country
goes to elect a new central government in 2024, it will, for its very survival,
be a much changed place from what we can see in the first days of 2020. Congress, in an echo of the 1940s, has
made it clear it would like to bring this government down even before its term
ends by creating mass public law and order problems.
They forget this is the
beginning of a new decade in the 21st century. One in which the
emergence of a New India will see to it that this country is not run for, to an
extent by, and largely on behalf of the minorities. Dressing it up in terms of
freedom of expression, plurality and justice is just so much self-serving propaganda
for the government’s opponents and a longed for return to the status quo.
This means, that like
the economic reforms of 1991, it is already too late to go back. And the quickened pace of the move
forward will leave nobody harbouring false illusions on rolling the time-clock
backwards.
(1,382 words)
For: Sirfnews
January 6th, 2020
Gautam Mukherjee
Very positive piece, Gautam. Congrats. But the glitch, more often than not, is that the sentinel warnings of people like you are often unheeded by the ones tasked with nation-building.
ReplyDelete