Mandir
Wahi Banayenge!
Whenever, it would seem, the BJP grows uncomfortable with
its Hindutva roots while in power, it automatically provokes the fates, goes
into decline electorally, and is decisively turfed out at the next general elections.
While the precedents don’t go very deep as the BJP only
ruled at the Centre once before, the
post mortem of the Vajpayee government’s ouster shows up this factor as an
important one.
This is probably because, without Hindutva, it has no
real USP to distinguish it from the Congress in public perception. Nuanced
differences in governance and approach look like so many blurred, self-serving,
and expedient lines. And the BJP is seen as a bad copy of the original. The
rank and file BJP and RSS/Sangh Parivar worker, bred on ideology, is both demoralised
and demotivated.
The Vajpayee administration lasted a full term with an
unwieldy coalition, but distanced itself from the RSS, and turned its back on
Hindutva issues including the special status of J&K, the Ayodhya Temple
movement, the Uniform Code Bill, and other such matters. It cited the
constraints of “coalition dharma”, but just how convincing is this?
Vajpayee could, after all, be bold to get what he wanted.
He enjoyed great personal popularity cutting across party lines, he detonated the
bomb just 13 days into office for the second time, he initiated visionary and
far reaching infrastructure development, and presided over a worthwhile
economic performance.
Whatever applied to Atal Bihari Vajpayee can be at least doubled in the case of Narendra
Damodardas Modi. Here is a person who was an RSS Pracharak for years, a man who
wanted to join the Belur Math as an ascetic and priest before that to wit.
Politics and power might have given him distance from
those formative years, but he didn’t win
the first parliamentary brute majority in 30 years without invoking Hindutva, and
receiving the extensive help of the RSS and the Sangh Parivar.
“Vikas” as a central Modi poll plank is all very well,
but the Congress and others in the regional Opposition can lay fair, if not
equal claim, to development and progress.
If Modi fails to self-correct in the remaining five
months, he could well lose power altogether. There is an urgent need to enthuse
the core BJP supporters. They seem to be upset, staying away in significant
numbers from the voting booths or pressing the NOTA button. To them, he has
neglected Hindutva issues, besides starting the building of good
roads towards the Char Dhams, inaugurating a railway line and stop to
facilitate Amar Nath, and putting in world class ropeways to Vaishno Devi and
the like.
While the delivery of Acche
Din too leaves much to be desired, as the Opposition never fails to point out,
the BJP voter is willing to give Modi more time to deliver on all that. It is
unreasonable to expect a man to do in 5 years what has not been done in over
six decades.
But, a majority saffron government, it is commonsensical,
is definitely expected to deliver much more on Hindutva. It is here that the
BJP has an opportunity to regain the initiative after a string of electoral losses
including the recently concluded “semi-finals”.
There is a feeling that the Supreme Court may reserve its
judgement till after the general elections, even if it sits on the Ayodhya
title suit on a daily basis starting in January 2019. If this happens, or if
there are further delays for the hearings, it becomes very important for the
Modi government to act.
It must proceed with the construction of the Ram Mandir
at Ayodhya on the disputed site by using an ordinance. If this government
initiates the construction of the Ram Mandir, it will greatly encourage the
Hindu masses in the critically important states of Uttar Pradesh and Bihar and
indeed in the entire Hindi Heartland. Of course, a communal backlash and
Opposition howl can be expected, even though it will be very difficult for the
Congress to oppose the Mandir without being squarely accused of minority
appeasement.
On the other hand, if the Modi government does nothing,
even if the SC does not proceed, it will be seen as a great let-down, not only
by the greater Sangh Parivar, who have been clamouring for the commencement of
construction, but by the rank and file BJP supporter too.
The Modi government cannot hope to get away with an
appeal to the modernist forces that support “Vikas”. Its very roots come from
much older impulses – from the soul of “Bharat Mata” herself, rather than the
British inspired “India”. A half of
which India has been torn asunder at Partition anyway, and the remainder is
much more the province of Congress.
Lest we forget the basics of the Saffron Party’s genesis,
amongst the shilling, scripted noises of an exaggerated farmer distress, a
spurious attempt at equivalence in
corruption, and other Opposition planks, we need to recapitulate.
In recent history,
the Lotus bloomed as a symbol of approaching national power with LK Advani’s
“phenomenally” successful Rath Yatra of 1990. This was post the 1989 general
elections to the 9th Lok Sabha that threw up an unstable coalition.
The BJP had campaigned using the Ayodhya movement, the
Lord Ram katha and symbolism that
resonated with the, till then, politically unawakened Hindu masses of North
India.
The Saffron Party then, and for years going forward, was
vilified night and day by the Congress and others as “communal and untouchable”
for voicing such blatant Hindu aspirations. Such bogus propaganda dropped the
first, 13 day Vajpayee government for want of one vote.
Nevertheless, that Hindutva was a potent threat was
obvious, because it flew in the face of the established Nehruvian “secular”
political narrative. BJP won a significant block of 85 seats in 1989.
The late Pramod Mahajan collaborated with LK Advani to
create the Toyota mini-bus Rath thereafter. It wended its way from the Somnath
temple in Gujarat, reconstructed by Sardar Patel in 1951, through the Hindi
Heartland towards the Ram Janmabhoomi in Ayodhya. The Somnath Temple as starting point, was
probably chosen for the symbolism. It
was not only very sacred but had been repeatedly destroyed by Muslim
invaders.
Lalu Prasad Yadav arrested LK Advani at Samastipur in
Bihar before he could take the Rath all the way into Ayodhya, but the desired
mass mobilization and momentum, had
already been created.
The Babri Masjid was demolished by Kar Sevaks just two
years later. For BJP, the Rath Yatra itself delivered 120 seats in the 10th
Lok Sabha of 1991, which lasted a full-term, despite being a minority
government, under Prime Minister PV Narasimha Rao.
Going back further, the revered Dr. Syama Prasad
Mookerjee, martyred to the nationalist cause in Kashmir at the young age of 53,
was the leader of the Hindu Mahasabha in Bengal.
The Hindu Mahasabha, established 1915, was really the
parent of the present Hindutva movement, and there were other highly respected
leaders such as Vinayak Damodar Savarkar who also came from it.
Mookerjee it was however, who established the Bhratiya Jan Sangh in 1951, the precursor to
the present day BJP, established only in 1980. Mookerjee set it up as the
political wing of the RSS, and not the Hindu Mahasabha.
Mookerjee not only professed a blend of Hindutva,
Capitalist and Nationalist views, having been instrumental in saving West
Bengal as part of India at Partition, but was keen to put forward an alternate
ideology to the Fabian Socialism imported by Jawaharlal Nehru.
At this present
juncture, it is important for Narendra Modi to remember all this, and deliver
satisfaction to his voters. It is a time
to reassert a commitment to the BJP’s core beliefs, and start the construction
of the Ram Temple in Ayodhya. He should realize that the Congress does not
stray very far from its pseudo-secular roots, and it would be a grave mistake
to become an also ran.
It is time, not only to make a beginning, but proceed
with all pace to build a magnificent Ram Mandir at Ayodhya. It should become
not just a place of fervent worship and assertion of Hindu identity, but an
architectural beauty for the world to marvel at. This work, if begun, will deliver a very good
chance to the BJP to romp home in 2019.
For:
The Sunday Guardian
(1,385
words)
December
27th, 2018
Gautam
Mukherjee
No comments:
Post a Comment