Oil On
Fire: The Open-Market Illusion In Statist Fetters
Prime Minister Narendra Modi needs to be reminded that when
he personally made the call for removing the remaining fuel subsidies, at the
beginning of his tenure, he made no mention of imposing fresh indirect taxes on
fuel.
Of course, even in
the erstwhile subsidized regime on fuel, the tax collections on sale of fuel far
outweighed the outgoings.
The impression given by Modi however was that he was
encouraging the free-market, and that Indians would henceforth pay whatever the
international prices dictated. Tickers at the pump would be revised daily or
more often, and it would be a two way street.
But did the Prime Minister think the whole matter through? Because
what the public got is its fuel, no longer subsidized, and at twice the
international prices!
This is proven by the rates at which our exports of refined
fuel are effected, before the imposition
of a plethora of Central and State taxes! The public has been made the victim
of a statist confidence trick in which the Finance Minister raised excise duty
9 times in the 50 months of this government, followed by State imposed ad valorem VAT, additional taxes et al.
And the State on its part, has done absolutely nothing, for
over a quarter century since liberalization, when fuel demand began to grow as
the stifling controls of the Licence-Permit Raj were dismantled.
Nothing at all, to develop a strategy to manage
contingencies and unforeseen exigencies of international oil prices. This even
though oil is the country’s largest import, at over 80% of its ever expanding
requirement. An import that involves an estimated $87.7 billion till March 31st
2018, up 25% on the year before, and
likely to go up another $30 billion this current fiscal. We are currently the 3rd
largest global importer of crude, importing over 220 million MT annually.
The Modi government,
which the public was hoping would be a departure from the lackadaisical
strategic planning of the past, has unfortunately been a let-down too.
Where was the
attempt to create a contingency Oil Import Fund when this government enjoyed
two years of low crude prices? Did its think-tanks conclude that international
crude prices would henceforth always be low?
For the military, and as a host for other countries, India
has begun to stockpile crude in underground reservoirs. But for itself, as an
economy, and for the public, it has no strategic vision, apart from attempted
sourcing at better prices, and bagging
oil exploration contracts abroad.
Why are there no bio-fuel refineries even though bumper
sugarcane harvests struggle to find takers and need massive government subsidy
and support prices? Other estimates conclude 58% of our vegetables and fruit
spoil for lack of modern cold chain facilities and this waste too could also
become biofuel.
India could meet perhaps 20% of its present needs for crude
if not more if it had the right policies in place, implementing them with a
will.
America has found its own way via high-tech shale-cracking,
to become crude self sufficient and a net exporter. India, on the other hand,
has been left behind by countries like Thailand, which has plenty of biofuel
availability at its pumps. Union Minister Gadkari recently promised Indian biofuel
by that magic year 2022, India’s 75th as a free country. A date
which appears to serve this government’s future wish-list in all matters!
Also consider that
when it comes to the over 7% fall in the rupee and counting, against the dollar,
the Thai Baht has fallen only 1.24%, by reducing its linkages with the US
dollar.
The government tries to justify holding the line on these
rapacious fuel prices by saying the taxes raised are going into infrastructure
development etc. without once being either transparent or specific. It also
says it has repaid the oil bond borrowings of the UPA to pay for the erstwhile
subsidies.
Highly educated apologists of the government try to keep
their finger in the dyke by invoking all kinds of macro-economic scaremongering,
hinting darkly at a stock market and economic collapse if the government does
not hold the line.
The fact is, the stock market has lost over 2% in just two
days, obviously unimpressed by the government’s policy actions, and interest
rates are likely to go up too.
The suspicion remains that at least a proportion of the
fuel taxes goes to pay for a bloated political and bureaucratic apparatus, that
has never once, in the 50 odd months of this government, attempted any form of
cost-cutting or austerity.
Instead, there have been salary and pension enhancements
for itself with metronomic regularity, not once but several times- pay
commission revisions, MP and MLA emolument revisions, allowance and perquisite
revisions and so on.
It is time to hold the Modi government to account for
ignoring the wishes of most, if not all of urban India, most affected by
unprecedented fuel prices.
The CAD and fiscal deficit, the inflationary effect on
everything via fuel as a vital input cost, is to be ignored only at this
government’s peril. Rating agencies are already downgrading India and foreign
capital is fleeing.
To be so obtuse
about this matter in an election season, is inexplicable, unless the Modi
government is banking heavily on the TINA factor .
But apart from the shocking lack of anticipation, evident
in the government’s bumbling responses
under attack, this vexed issue of retail fuel pricing has quite a policy
history. Diesel in particular, along with its cousin Kerosene, were long
thought to be a poor man’s fuel, even though heavy transport and trains used
Diesel too. And so, they was highly subsidized. The limited Kerosene in use
today continues to be so.
Petrol came next, but in the old Swadeshi/Socialist days, there
were only a restricted number of cars and two-wheelers produced, and waiting
lists for new ones ran into years.
Aviation fuel and aircraft parking charges, were, and still
are, outrageously priced in India. It is still treated as a luxury item that
facilitates air travel by the rich.
Gradually, over a decade after liberalisation, people could
not only buy freely and “off-the-shelf”, from a wide selection of transport
options, but banks eagerly financed them with affordable EMIs.
As cars, motorcycles, scooters, grew in number alongside
trucks and buses and expansion of the rail, metro, road, waterways, aviation,
port sectors - the subsidies on fuel started to burgeon. Successive governments
struggled to finance the fuel subsidies, and increasingly on LPG for the poor,
as the gas finds off-shore made it available. The LPG direct subsidy to the
poor is the largest remaining chunk still operative.
As the predecessor governments started to both raise prices
and take subsidies off in miniscule doses, the consuming public was not unduly
upset. It started with the more elite petrol and aviation fuel, and then
expanded gingerly to diesel, kerosene and LPG too.
International crude
prices raged high through most of UPA I & II, and prices of fuel in India
crept up steadily. But it is only now
that the free-floating pricing from the oil marketing companies and not the
Petroleum Ministry, plus choke inducing government taxes, have resulted in
hefty, daily upward price revisions!
Today, the Central and State governments do occasionally
tinker with fuel prices by up to 3-4 rupees, fearful of public anger, but this
is far from adequate to control the Frankenstein monster a lack of foresight
has created.
To sacrifice the micro in favour of confusion over macro
economics, is an old BJP failing. It resulted in ending the tenure of AB
Vajpayee, despite his failed “India Shining” re-election campaign in 2004.
And now, seeking approbation from FIIs, WB, IMF,
international rating agencies like Moody and Fitch, is seemingly being given
priority over working for the relief of the Indian people.
There is, in addition, probably a confused socialism at
play. The BJP seems content to ignore the aspirations of the urban masses and
classes, even though it forms almost half the electorate, in favour of a mythic
solidarity with the rural hinterland. Is this not over confidence gone horribly
wrong?
The BJP, says its Party President Amit Shah, expects to win
handsomely in 2019, and rule for another “fifty years”.
But how does clubbing an opportunistic Opposition agitation
for a cut in fuel prices, with the genuine demand for relief from the hurting,
angry masses, help in the reelection endeavour?
(1,397
words)
For: The Sunday Guardian
September
12th, 2018
Gautam
Mukherjee
No comments:
Post a Comment