Implications Of The Last Minute Rescue Of A
No-Deal Brexit
The last minute reprieve to a no-deal Brexit has
prevented the worst of a hard landing.
The agreement that has come is the best one can have under the hard negotiating
circumstances, with economic challenges facing both the EU and Britain.
It is most interesting that Protestant Northern
Ireland, a part of the UK, will stay in the EU, while the rest of Britain
leaves. It could therefore conceivably reunite with EIRE, very much in the EU,
and leave the UK in due course. Already, there is an increased level of
cooperation between Catholic Republic of Ireland and Protestant Northern
Ireland.
Scotland may not like to stay in post Brexit Britain
either. It voted 62% in favour of staying in the EU at the infamous 2016
referendum, but for the moment, it seems to have been contained. However, the
Scottish Nationalist Party (SNP) is without an absolute majority in the
Scottish Parliament at present. Should the SNP gain a majority in elections due
in May 2021, there could well be a shift towards independence.
As for the joint administration of EU and British
waters for fishing by both sides, it will remain to be seen how the catches are
distributed. There is a formula agreed on for five years, after which British
waters will become exclusive to Britain and likewise for EU waters for the
Europeans.
It is a complex parting of ways, not only in matters
of trade, taxation, movements, and commerce, but the untangling of the non-applicability
of EU laws concerning anything in Britain and vice versa. Taxation is being
largely kept neutral at present but of course this could change in future.
London, till now a major financial capital of Europe,
will not be able to offer financial services into the EU henceforth without
setting up on the Continent according to their laws. British qualifications may
have to be overlaid with EU ones. Brexit has already seen quite a few
international players relocating almost entirely across the Channel.
British manufacturing that imports parts from the EU
has to stockpile rather than work on zero inventory or last-minute provisioning.
Many will lose their competitive edge on the continent as a consequence.
The good news is that the UK can now go forth and
enter into trade deals on its own bat with other countries, such as India. Bilateral
trade is currently at a modest $15.5 billion in 2019-20.
Britain may be keen on a free trade agreement (FTA) with
India which has a lucrative domestic market. This especially because an FTA
with America may not fructify quite so easily or quickly. American goods could
swamp the UK. Being part of the EU, it was the strain of more EU imports vis a
vis British exports that hastened the
split. India on its part will be looking at high technology from Britain, joint
ventures to improve our self-reliance, professional training in various fields
and cooperation in the higher reaches of the Services Sector.
With Boris Johnson set to grace the occasion on our
forthcoming Republic Day shortly, there may be a boost to the process.
India counts Britain as its sixth largest source of
foreign direct investment (FDI). With $30 billion incoming over the last 20
years, it accounts for 6% of total FDI into India presently.
The UK will need to reorient its diplomatic
relationship with India, as the UAE and Saudi Arabia have done. It will have to
jettison some, if not all of its adversarial positions vis a vis Pakistani
interests and those of China.
It must stop commenting on India’s internal matters,
its politics, its leadership, certainly at any official level. This is
necessary to clear the decks between the two countries. India is not interested
in hectoring from its former colonial master, or partisan support given to a
defeated Opposition.
The Leftist portions of British media and the Labour
Party display a consistent hostility towards the Modi government. Calling an
elected government all sorts of names is not endearing the British to the
Indian establishment. Casting slurs on the majority Hindu community is also
unacceptable.
India’s relative leverage to get sweeter terms as well
as less interference in its internal affairs is now considerably enhanced. The
various anti-India groups and lobbies that seem to operate freely in London and
elsewhere in Britain will have to be reigned in.
If bold initiatives to reassure Indian sensitivities
are undertaken by Britain, it will be first of all to its own benefit.
Presently, India does have several alternatives such as France, Russia, the
United States and Israel, for ongoing high technology cooperation, particularly
in joint venture defence manufacturing.
Countries and companies relocating some of their
manufacturing from China post the Covid-19 pandemic is also creating new
possibilities and strategic depth.
Cooperation on the high seas, particularly in the Indian
Ocean and the Asia-Pacific with the QUAD nations of the US, Australia, India,
Japan is attracting other regional players such as Vietnam and Singapore as
well.
France, Britain and Germany, Russia have also begun to
contribute naval power to the region as well. All these countries are
developing a common strategy to keep the international shipping lanes in the
region open and unhindered by Chinese hegemony. Britain’s commitment towards
this changing world order will be of particular interest to India.
While Britain as we know it now may be truncated in
the years ahead, it has much to contribute by way of expertise in multiple
areas to a developing India.
It will be a new relationship, based not on the
erstwhile Raj or the near pointless Commonwealth, but on 21st
century realities. This as the world begins the third decade of this century. And
India enters its 75th year as an independent democratic republic.
(956 words)
For: Sirfnews
December 29th, 2020
Gautam Mukherjee