The Surprising
Paris Court Verdict on Marine Le Pen Is A Blot On French Democracy
In a move, startling
from a republic that is the supposedly modern torchbearer of Liberte,Egalite
et Fraternite, the latest move smacks of a hatchet-job style dictatorship
to fix the political arena. Albeit, it was a longish trial, with all the
trappings of proper judicial examination and rigour. But is the judiciary in
France, along with its now tottering government, infected with leftist bias?
Earlier this
week, a Paris Court judge that banned far-right leader Marine Le Pen from
contesting elections for five years acknowledged that the ‘embezzlement’ of Euro
4 million of EU funds between 2004-2016, to pay staff in her National Rally
party, rather than parliamentary aides, did nor enrich her or her 24
co-defendants in their personal capacity.
The Paris
Court judge described the diverted payments as a ‘democratic bypass’ that
deceived both voters and the European Parliament, in what seems to many to be
judicial overreach.
Le Pen has
been fined Euro 100,000 and sentenced to four years in prison, two of which
will be suspended, and the other two served under house arrest with electronic
monitoring. But her ban from running for office is with immediate effect, even
though she can continue to serve as a lawmaker till new elections are called
for. If she is corrupt, how do these niceties work?
All but one
of her co-defendants received suspended prison sentences of varying severity
also affecting their ability to participate in the political process going
forward. Le Pen has vowed to appeal the rulings, calling the verdict ‘political
death’ for her personally.
Le Pen’s
lawyers argued that the distinction between a politician’s work as a lawmaker
and as a party member was artificial. Seeming to agree with this position,
President Donald Trump said he had not expected a guilty verdict at all from
the court proceedings.
But
crucially, with Le Pen banned from contesting for five years, unless the appeal
overturns her conviction, the focus has rapidly shifted to her protégé the 29
year-old Jordan Bardella, who could well become the National Rally’s
presidential candidate in 2027. He may be inexperienced but Macron himself is
still in his forties and began his rising political career much earlier..
Bardella called the rulings an ‘execution’ of democracy on X.
Le Pen can
contest the elections in 2032, when she will be 64.
The rampant
but unproven suspicion from those who support Le Pen and her National Rally
Party, is that President Emmanuel Macron and his La Republique en Marche (LREM),
may have worked behind the scenes to try and eliminate a formidable challenger
from the fray. Marine Le Pen is the leader of the resurgent Conservative
movement in French politics.
Could such a
partisan ruling on questionable charges happen in India? Well it did. When the
Allahabad High Court overturned Prime Minister Indira Gandhi’s election, it
resulted in the infamous Emergency. Of course, Mrs. Gandhi was the sitting
prime minister at the time, with the entire machinery of government at her
disposal. Nothing so dramatic has been tried by the judiciary since.
While Indian
politics today routinely tolerates virulent opposition, any such move by the
Indian courts against the opposition figures, would certainly activate the
anti-India lobbies in Europe, America, China, Pakistan, Bangladesh, Turkey, and
amongst dissidents such as Islamic militants and Khalistanis. They would
unleash a massive vilification campaign. They would howl for the blood of the
ruling ‘Hindu Nationalist Party’ that is dominant in the NDA.
Fortunately,
in India however, that ship seems to have sailed, because the voting public
seems to much prefer the BJP and the NDA in most elections.
But
surprisingly, little has surfaced by way of criticism in the European media
against the bizarre Paris Court ruling. Marine Le Pen is being supported, not by all
the powers that are proxy fighting Russia in Ukraine, but by the other side.
From around
the political universe, most conservative leaders have or are beginning to
speak up in support.
Macron must
have thought that with the confusion over Ukraine and beleaguered European
support for its resistance, he could get away with this subversion of democracy
at this time. However, many members of the French public per polls conducted
after the verdict see it in terms of independence of the judiciary. Who was polled however? If you poll the left
they would signal good riddance of course.
Will the
French general elections in 2027, still two years away, be affected? The
Russia-Ukraine War is expected to end well before that. America’s support for
the Europeans in NATO has already weakened. Other international fora are also
in retreat as America withdraws into its ‘America First’ stance. Can Macron’s
France carry its own left-of-centre torch in European politics in 2027?
The public has
been showing growing preference for Le Pen’s far-right politics, with her finishing
as runner-up to Macron as president in both 2017 and 2022. So, will this
suspected skullduggery then work against Macron at the hustings?
Support for Le Pen came in promptly from Hungary and Russia
after the rulings. Both condemned them as an attack on democracy. Victor Orban,
the Hungarian prime minister expressed solidarity by posting ‘Je Suis Marine!’
The Russian spokesman said the ruling showed a growing tendency to subvert
democratic impulses in Western Europe. Particularly those that were
conservative and favoured better relations with Russia.
In addition,
Italy’s Giorgia Meloni, US President Donald Trump and tech billionaire Elon
Musk have all spoken up in disapproval of the attempt to ban Le Pen from contesting
elections. India, that enjoys excellent relations with Emmanuel Macron led
France, particularly in the sphere of defence equipment, has been silent on
this matter so far.
President
Trump called the verdict ‘a big deal’ and said Le Pen was the leading contender.
He also likened it to what was done to him in the lead-up to the 2024 elections
in America. Others who have already spoken up in support of Le Pen are Italian
League Party boss Matteo Salvini and Dutch populist Geert Wilders. Whatever be the merits and demerits of the case, the
timing of the sharp negative verdict raises more questions than it lays to rest about the state of democratic
norms in France.
(1,030
words)
April 2nd,
2025
For:
Firstpost, News18.com
Gautam
Mukherjee